NCAA Pushes Protect College Sports Act to Override Brendan Sorsby Ruling
The NCAA is pushing for the passage of the Protect College Sports Act to override a legal victory by Texas Tech quarterback Brendan Sorsby, according to a memo sent to D-I conference commissioners. The bill, introduced by Sen. Ted Cruz and Sen. Maria Cantwell, would allow the NCAA to enforce its own gambling-related eligibility rules regardless of certain state court rulings, Yahoo Sports reported.
The NCAA sent the memo on Friday, asserting that the legislation would “resolve” the Sorsby situation if it becomes law before his legal battle concludes. The organization is advocating for this specific provision to remain in the bill ahead of a markup scheduled for next week.
How the Protect College Sports Act affects Brendan Sorsby
Brendan Sorsby successfully sued the NCAA in state court to overturn a mandate that made him ineligible. Sorsby admitted to placing thousands of sports bets, including wagers on his own team, according to the NCAA memo.
A Lubbock, Texas, judge granted Sorsby an injunction on Monday. This ruling allows him to play in the 2026 season, though he must sit out the first two games against Oregon State and Abilene Christian.
The NCAA argues that the Protect College Sports Act provides clear authority to restrict eligibility based on improper gambling. While the bill generally does not override state-level personal injury or contract claims, the NCAA stated it does override any state law claim that directly conflicts with the bill’s permissions.
What are the broader implications for college athletics?
The NCAA’s position could affect other athletes who have received injunctions. Ole Miss quarterback Trinidad Chambliss is currently in a similar legal position, though his case involves an illness rather than gambling violations.
The proposed law aims to address various issues in college athletics by allowing the NCAA to enforce rules without facing constant litigation. If passed, the NCAA believes a state court would be unable to order the organization to reverse gambling-related enforcement.
How have universities and conferences reacted?
The ruling in favor of Sorsby triggered immediate backlash across the country. Athletic directors at Georgia and Nebraska have threatened to boycott future games against Texas Tech.
The Big Ten has discussed a moratorium on scheduling Texas Tech in all sports. Additionally, the Big 12 held a conference call with its athletic directors on Tuesday to discuss the matter.
Texas Tech athletic director Kirby Hocutt defended the program’s actions and Sorsby. Hocutt acknowledged the frustration of his peers but indicated the school is preparing legal action if the Big 12 imposes sanctions.
What happens next in the Sorsby case?
The outcome depends largely on the legislative timeline. The Protect College Sports Act could override Sorsby’s legal challenge if it passes and takes effect before the case is fully resolved.
However, there is no guarantee the bill will pass, or that it will do so before the legal battle concludes. In the meantime, the Big 12 continues to weigh possible sanctions against Texas Tech amid a legal warning from the Texas Attorney General.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the Protect College Sports Act?
It is a bill introduced by Sen. Ted Cruz and Sen. Maria Cantwell designed to address issues in college athletics and allow the NCAA to enforce its rules without constant litigation.
Why did Brendan Sorsby sue the NCAA?
Sorsby challenged his NCAA-mandated ineligibility under state contract law, arguing that the NCAA broke a promise or agreement after he admitted to placing thousands of sports bets.
Which conferences are reacting to the Sorsby ruling?
The Big 12 has held meetings regarding sanctions, and the Big Ten has discussed a moratorium on scheduling Texas Tech in all sports.
Should federal legislation have the power to override state court decisions regarding student-athlete eligibility?