Russian Oreshnik Missile Fails and Hits Own Positions in Donetsk, ISW Reports

Russian Oreshnik Missile Fails and Hits Own Positions in Donetsk, ISW Reports

May 26, 2026 discoverhiddenusacom Business

A high-cost military operation on May 24 targeting Kyiv has highlighted significant technical vulnerabilities and financial inefficiencies in Russia’s latest weaponry. Reports indicate that while two Oreshnik ballistic missiles were deployed, one likely suffered a technical failure, crashing into Russian-controlled territory in the Donetsk region.

Technical Failure and Operational Impact

According to the Institute for the Study of War (ISW), the failed missile landed in the occupied areas of Avdiivka or Yasynuvata, approximately 40 kilometers from the front line. The failure was captured by a camera in Donetsk facing north, which recorded the descent of six sub-munitions characteristic of the Oreshnik system.

From Instagram — related to Bila Tserkva, Ukrainian Ministry of Defense

Monitoring channels indicated the first missile was launched around 1:00 AM, but no impact was ever reported. It is believed this first unit malfunctioned en route to the capital, prompting the launch of a second non-nuclear Oreshnik that eventually reached the Bila Tserkva area.

Did You Know? A single Oreshnik missile is estimated to cost approximately $50 million.

The Financial Cost of the Strike

The economic scale of the May 24 assault was substantial. ArmyInform, an agency of the Ukrainian Ministry of Defense, estimated the total cost of the strike package at $361 million.

Russia Ukraine War | Kyiv Burns As Moscow Unleashes Hypersonic Ballistic Oreshnik Missile

The ISW noted that if the launch of a second Oreshnik is confirmed, the total cost of the attack would rise to $411 million. This represents a significant expenditure for a mission with contested results.

Expert Insight: Samantha Carter suggests that the disparity between the extreme cost of these weapons and their actual strategic yield creates a diminishing return on investment. When “state-of-the-art” assets fail or hit non-strategic targets, the financial loss is compounded by a loss of psychological deterrence.

Strategic Disputes and Internal Criticism

Despite the Russian Ministry of Defense claiming that “all designated targets were hit” and describing the strike as a “response to the terrorist attacks of Ukraine,” internal reactions have been critical. Ruslan Leviev of the Conflict Intelligence Team and the “Fighterbomber” channel suggested the intended target was an airbase.

Pro-Russian “z-bloggers” have dismissed the deployment as “showy.” The channel “Rybar” argued that the psychological effect of such strikes is “with each time becomes weaker,” while “Two Majors” highlighted a lack of any “strategic or at least symbolic” target.

Military correspondent Vladimir Romanov was more blunt, stating that the Ministry of Defense “just drove very expensive iron into the ground for a beautiful picture” that is only believed by pensioners.

Frequently Asked Questions

What was the estimated cost of the May 24 attack?
The initial estimate from ArmyInform was $361 million, which could increase to $411 million if a second Oreshnik missile launch is confirmed.

Where did the failed Oreshnik missile land?
The missile likely malfunctioned and fell on Russian positions in the occupied Donetsk region, specifically in the area of Avdiivka or Yasynuvata.

What was the reported target of the successful missile?
While the Russian Ministry of Defense did not specify the target, sources including Ruslan Leviev and the “Fighterbomber” channel indicated the target was an airbase.

Do you believe the high financial cost of advanced weaponry is justified if the strategic impact is primarily psychological?