Sule & Teddy Pardiyana: Pengasuhan & Nafkah Anak

Comedian Sule has publicly expressed his frustration with Teddy Pardiyana, the widower of his late ex-wife Lina Jubaedah, over what he perceives as attempts to involve their children in financial matters related to Bintang, Teddy’s child with Lina. The dispute centers on the responsibility for Bintang’s financial support and accusations of Teddy seeking funds from Sule’s sons, Rizky Febian and his siblings.

Rising Tensions and Parental Responsibility

Sule, a well-known entertainer originating from Cimahi, has repeatedly voiced his concerns regarding Teddy’s requests for financial assistance from his children for Bintang’s upkeep. While Sule acknowledges his children’s willingness to support Bintang, he firmly believes that the financial burden should not fall upon them. He stated, “Apa kewajibannya anak-anak untuk membiayai? Tidaklah,” – meaning, “What obligation do the children have to finance [him]? None at all.”

Did You Know? Sule made these statements while at Studio Brownis TransTV in Jakarta Selatan on February 12, 2026.

Sule didn’t hesitate to condemn what he views as a dereliction of parental duty, stating, “Terlalu hina menurut saya laki-laki tidak bisa membiayai anaknya,” – “It’s too shameful in my opinion for a man to be unable to support his child.” He emphasized that children are a trust, not a burden to be passed onto others, asserting, “Anak itu titipan, bukan dititip-titipin,” – “A child is a trust, not something to be passed around.”

Accusations of Dishonesty and Neglect

Sule maintains that Teddy Pardiyana is solely responsible for Bintang’s financial well-being and that any difficulties Teddy faces in fulfilling this obligation are not Sule’s concern. He also called for transparency regarding Bintang’s care, referencing previous statements made by Rizky Febian during inheritance proceedings, which alleged that Teddy frequently entrusted Bintang to individuals close to the late Lina Jubaedah.

Expert Insight: Disputes over financial responsibility for children following a divorce or the death of a parent are unfortunately common. This case highlights the emotional toll such conflicts can take on all parties involved, particularly when children are perceived to be caught in the middle.

Sule concluded with a direct appeal to Teddy Pardiyana, urging him to cease what he considers deceptive practices, stating, “Intinya udahlah, jangan banyak bohonglah intinya mah,” – “Basically, just stop lying, that’s all.”

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the core of the dispute?

The dispute centers on Sule’s belief that Teddy Pardiyana should be solely responsible for the financial support of his child, Bintang, and that it is inappropriate for Teddy to request funds from Sule’s children.

What has Rizky Febian’s role been in this situation?

Rizky Febian previously stated during inheritance proceedings that Teddy Pardiyana often left Bintang in the care of people close to Lina Jubaedah.

What is Sule’s primary concern?

Sule’s primary concern is that his children should not be financially burdened with supporting Bintang, and that Teddy Pardiyana should take full responsibility for his child’s welfare.

As this situation unfolds, further legal proceedings or public statements could occur. It remains to be seen whether Teddy Pardiyana will address Sule’s concerns or if the conflict will escalate. A possible next step could be a private mediation attempt between the parties involved, though this is not confirmed.