US Megabanks Boost Repo Exposures Following SLR Reform
US systemic banks increased repo-style transaction exposures by 11.6% in the first quarter, with total volumes exceeding $2.5 trillion. According to Risk.net, this growth followed the adoption of reformed supplementary leverage ratios (SLRs) by seven of eight global systemically important banks, excluding BNY, which lowered leverage-based capital requirements.
The surge in leverage exposures contributed to record-low SLRs at four specific lenders during the first quarter. These banks shifted their balance sheets as the reformed capital rules took effect.
How did repo exposures affect bank leverage in Q1?
Repo-style transactions topped $2.5 trillion as the largest US banks expanded their activity. Risk.net reports that the 11.6% growth in these exposures drove a broader increase in leverage.
This trend resulted in four lenders hitting record-low supplementary leverage ratios. The shift occurred as banks utilized the new regulatory framework to manage their capital more aggressively.
Why did the SLR reform trigger this growth?
The reformed SLR lowered the leverage-based capital requirements for the participating banks. According to Risk.net, this regulatory change removed previous constraints on how banks held capital against their exposures.
Because the cost of maintaining these positions decreased, seven of the eight G-Sibs adopted the reform immediately in the first quarter. This allowed for the rapid expansion of repo-style transactions.
What may happen to systemic bank exposures next?
Banks could continue to increase their repo-style transactions if the reformed SLR remains the standard for capital requirements. This may lead to further volatility in leverage ratios across the largest US lenders.

A possible next step is that BNY may eventually adopt the reform to align with the other seven G-Sibs. If this occurs, total systemic repo volumes could rise further as the final major lender adjusts its capital strategy.
Frequently Asked Questions
What was the growth rate of repo-style transactions in Q1?
Exposures for repo-style transactions at the largest US banks grew by 11.6%.
How many global systemically important banks adopted the reformed SLR?
Seven out of eight G-Sibs adopted the reformed SLR, with BNY being the only exception.
What was the impact of the SLR reform on capital requirements?
The reform lowered leverage-based capital requirements across the participating banks.
How do you think shifting capital requirements affect the stability of the broader banking system?