Byron Buxton Shuts Down Trade Rumors With Minnesota Twins
Minnesota Twins center fielder Byron Buxton stated on June 18, 2026, that he intends to remain with the team despite speculation he could be traded before the Aug. 3 deadline. Buxton, who possesses a full no-trade clause, told The Athletic, “I’m a Twin.”
What are the terms of Byron Buxton’s contract?
Buxton is currently playing under a seven-year, $100 million contract signed in December 2021. He has two years remaining on that deal.
A full no-trade clause gives Buxton the power to block any potential deal. He told The Athletic that the only way he leaves is if the team talks to him and tells him “something else.”
His current performance includes a .270 batting average with 23 home runs and 36 RBIs across 64 games.
How does this fit into the Minnesota Twins’ financial strategy?
The franchise has recently prioritized cost-cutting. According to the provided data, the team slashed payroll by $38 million entering the current season.
This follows a trend from the previous trade deadline when Minnesota unloaded 10 different players. Buxton’s commitment to the team contrasts with these broader roster reductions.
Buxton previously indicated at the 2025 All-Star Game that he planned to remain a Twin for life.
What are the Twins’ current playoff prospects?
Minnesota currently holds a 36-40 record. They sit third in the AL Central, trailing first-place Cleveland by 4.5 games.
The team remains in contention for a wild-card spot. FanGraphs reports the Twins have a 28.7% chance of making the playoffs.
Depending on the team’s trajectory, Minnesota may seek further roster changes before August 3, though Buxton’s no-trade clause could limit those options.
Frequently Asked Questions
When is the MLB trade deadline?
The trade deadline is August 3.
What are Byron Buxton’s current statistics?
Buxton is hitting .270 with 23 home runs and 36 RBIs in 64 games.
What is the Twins’ current standing in the AL Central?
The Twins are third in the AL Central, 4.5 games behind Cleveland.
Do you think a player’s no-trade clause should outweigh a team’s need to cut payroll?