Can Stock Market Investments Save Social Security From Looming Benefit Cuts?
Social Security benefits could face a 22% cut by 2032 unless lawmakers enact adjustments, according to new projections showing the trust fund will run out of money sooner than previously thought. The current system relies on a trust fund to cover the gap where payroll tax revenue is insufficient to fund benefits.
Why is the Social Security trust fund at risk?
Revenue from payroll taxes has not been enough to fund current benefits for years, according to the provided report. The program has relied on the trust fund to bridge this deficit.

Once the trust fund is exhausted, Social Security will only be able to distribute the revenue it collects. This fiscal cliff is why projections now warn of a benefit reduction by 2032.
How would the Cassidy-Kaine proposal address the deficit?
Senators Bill Cassidy, R-La., and Tim Kaine, D-Va., proposed a plan to maintain current benefits without raising taxes or cutting payouts. Their strategy relies on borrowing and stock market returns.

The plan involves borrowing $1.5 trillion to create an investment fund composed of stocks and other risk assets. The senators argue these assets would offer better returns than Treasury bonds over 75 years.
Additionally, the plan requires borrowing $25.1 trillion to cover the revenue gap between benefits and payroll taxes during that same period. The total new borrowing would reach $26.6 trillion, which the fund’s returns would then be used to pay down.
Why does Boston College argue the investment plan may fail?
The Center for Retirement Research at Boston College ran simulations suggesting the Cassidy-Kaine plan is unlikely to work. While the proposal assumes a 6.5% real annual return, volatility creates significant risk.
Boston College authors Anqi Chen, Alicia Munnell, and Jean-Pierre Aubry reported that the gamble fails to cover the debt about 64% of the time, even at a 6.5% return. If real returns drop to 4%, the failure rate climbs to 83%.
The report notes that total federal debt is $39 trillion, with publicly held debt at 100% of GDP. Adding more debt could affect interest rates and the stock market, potentially leaving the government with large interest payments in the 75th year.
What are “Trump accounts” and how do they differ?
Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, has suggested “Trump accounts” as a method to revamp Social Security. These are tax-advantaged savings accounts for children under 18, established under last year’s One Big Beautiful Bill Act.
Cruz stated these accounts are “Social Security personal accounts” designed to mimic Australia’s superannuation program. That system requires employers to pay into investment funds to reduce reliance on public pensions.
Cruz predicts these accounts could become ubiquitous workplace benefits, similar to 401ks, with employer matching. He suggests that as these accounts grow, taxpayers may become more open to diverting their own payroll taxes into personal accounts rather than sending them to the government.
What are the potential consequences of these reforms?
Diverting current payroll taxes into personal accounts could negatively impact today’s retirees, as Social Security is funded by current workers. Sen. Cruz did not specify how the program would be funded if workers shifted payments to Trump accounts.

Alternatively, Boston College suggests a different stock-based approach. Their simulations indicate that combining tax hikes or benefit cuts with a 40% stock allocation in the trust fund could keep the system solvent indefinitely.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the projected cut to Social Security benefits?
Benefits would face a 22% cut by 2032 if no adjustments are made to the trust fund.
How much total debt would the Cassidy-Kaine plan create?
The proposal would require a total of $26.6 trillion in new borrowing—$1.5 trillion for an investment fund and $25.1 trillion to cover the revenue gap.
What is the goal of “Trump accounts” according to Sen. Ted Cruz?
The goal is to create personal investment accounts similar to Australia’s superannuation program to reduce reliance on public pensions.
Would you prefer a guaranteed lower benefit or a market-based account with higher potential risk?