Paul London: Social Media & Lowered Standards Ruined Wrestling

Former WWE Tag Team Champion Paul London recently discussed his departure from professional wrestling and his assessment of the current industry landscape during an appearance on the Insight With Chris Van Vliet podcast. London attributed a portion of his break from wrestling to the pressures of social media and expressed concerns about the direction of the sport.

The Impact of Social Media

London described social media as a “silly tool” and an “edited illusion,” noting its function primarily as a promotional device. He suggested that the curated nature of online platforms contributes to a disconnect from reality. He stated, “For the most part, it’s an edited illusion, right? Everyone living their best lives and we’re so happy and all this stuff.”

Did You Know? Paul London is a former WWE Tag Team Champion.

Shifting Standards in Wrestling

London voiced criticism regarding what he perceives as a decline in standards within professional wrestling. He connected this shift to the “Speaking Out” movement, acknowledging its necessity in allowing previously unheard voices to be heard, but also suggesting it inadvertently lowered barriers to entry. He explained, “It did allow voices to be heard that should have been heard in the first place. But it also didn’t just open the doors, it just took the doors off the hinges.”

He expressed frustration with individuals entering the profession without adequate training or skill, stating, “So now anybody can be a wrestler who isn’t a wrestler.” London believes this influx of unqualified performers compromises the quality of the product, making it “sh*ttier and phonier, more cooperative and more planned, more rehearsed, and it’s just unwatchable.” He went so far as to say he finds it difficult to watch current wrestling programming.

Expert Insight: London’s comments highlight a tension between the desire for inclusivity and the maintenance of professional standards within a performance-based industry. The removal of traditional gatekeepers, while potentially empowering, could lead to a dilution of skill and authenticity if not accompanied by robust training and evaluation processes.

Potential Future Developments

It is possible that London’s comments could fuel further debate within the wrestling community regarding the balance between accessibility and quality control. A possible next step could be increased discussion about training standards and the criteria for entering the profession. Analysts expect that the industry may grapple with defining what constitutes a “qualified” wrestler in a changing landscape. It remains to be seen if wrestling organizations will respond to these concerns with changes to their recruitment or training practices.

Frequently Asked Questions

What did Paul London say about social media?

Paul London believes social media is a “silly tool” and an “edited illusion” that primarily serves as a promotional device, contributing to a disconnect from reality.

How did Paul London view the “Speaking Out” movement?

Paul London stated that while the “Speaking Out” movement was necessary to allow unheard voices to be heard, it also removed barriers that previously existed, potentially allowing unqualified individuals to enter the wrestling industry.

What is Paul London’s current view of professional wrestling?

Paul London expressed frustration with the current state of professional wrestling, stating that he finds it “unwatchable” due to a perceived lack of standards and an influx of performers he believes are not adequately trained.

Given these concerns about the current state of professional wrestling, what role do you believe training and experience should play in determining who participates in the sport?